Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Would the government lie about the existence of an effective treatment for cancer?

Would the government deny that competent, controlled clinical trials have demonstrated there is a drug that is effective against most types--and stages--of cancer, that is safe, inexpensive and free from serious clinical side effects?

The answer is 'yes.' The drug's name is hydrazine sulfate. If you're a reader of the blog MedTruth, you've already seen several articles on this drug. But perhaps you'd like to witness the actual commencement of this official lying and opposition to this drug.

The year was 1976, the date, March 8. Because of my concern regarding controversy and irregularities by cancer authorities in the early stages of clinical testing of the drug hydrazine sulfate, developed by the Syracuse (New York) Cancer Research Institute, veteran Syracuse Congressman James M. Hanley (Chair of the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee and a member of several important subcommittees, including Manpower and Civil Service, Housing and Community Development, Institutions and Finance, Small Business Oversight and Minority Enterprise, Small Business Administration Legislation), requested a "status report" on hydrazine sulfate from the director of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)--part of the federal government and this country's, and the world's, most influential cancer agency. Within two weeks he received a reply that stated: "Hydrazine sulfate has been tested in the Soviet Union at the Petrov Institute in Leningrad [St Petersburg]. In a clinical study directed by Dr. Michael Gershanovich, no evidence of meaningful anticancer activity was reported. This information was communicated to the NCI under the Joint U.S.-U.S.S.R. Health Agreement of 1972." Congresman Hanley forwarded me the reply.

The letter was devastating to me personally. Although I had known that cancer scientists in the Soviet Union were performing mouse and rat studies with hydrazine sulfate (they had picked up from our original work published in the medical literature), I had no idea they had already performed human studies--and that these studies were negative. Reading this letter--and what it said--constituted the lowest point in my professional career. I was dejected the entire day, unable to believe the contents of the letter.

The very next day a scenario occurred that could only have been fashioned in Hollywood. The mailman came to the large plate-glass front doors of our reception suite (where I was at the time) and I could see he was holding a five-by-seven inch shiny manilla envelope in his hand, the kind one used to see in the Depression days of the 1930s, and to boot it was totally unsealed. He entered the suite and handed the receptionist the envelope, for which she had to sign. It was registered and postmarked "Leningrad." We did not know anybody in Leningrad, nor were we expecting mail from Leningrad. The receptionist handed me the unsealed envelope and we all--several of our laboratory staff had gathered in the reception area--looked at each other puzzled. I removed the contents of the envelope. It was a reprint of a scientific study--all in Russian, except for the English abstract (summary) at the end of the article. The principal investigator was indicated as Dr. Michael L. Gershanovich and the study site as the N. N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology. The title of the paper was "Experimental and Clinical Data on Antitumor Action of Hydrazine Sulfate," and the English summary read:

"Clinical observations enabled us to state a definite
therapeutic effect of hydrazine sulfate in patients
with lymphogranulomatosis [Hodgkin's and non-
Hodgkin's lymphoma] and malignant tumors of
various localizations in far-advanced stages, where
other measures of specific therapy failed." [The
summary added that because of the favorable
outcome, the study was being enlarged immediately.]

I was stunned to read this summary. It was from the same Russian study to which the NCI reply to Congressman Hanley referred--only it was exactly opposite of what was communicated to Congressman Hanley. Upon translation of the entire study, the following therapeutic effects of hydrazine sulfate in 48 "factually terminal" [stage 4] patients--with different types of cancer--were detailed: "diminution or disappearance of pleural effusions and ascites [fluid accumulation in the chest cavity and abdomen, containing individual cancer cells], lowering of fever, normalization of laboratory indices, diminution or disappeance of pain, increased appetite with cessation of weight loss or weight gain, increase in strength, disappeance of hemoptysis [spitting of blood in patients with lung cancer], increased overall performance status [ability to ambulate and perform work], tumor stabilization [no increase in tumor size], tumor regression." Therapeutic benefits were registered without significant clinical side effects: "Pharmacological characteristics of this compound demonstrate that the antitumor effect is observed in doses which do not produce toxicity."

No meaningful anticancer activity?

As to the important question whether the NCI response to Congressman Hanley represented an innocent error on the part of the NCI or a deliberate fabrication, a further letter from the NCI, dated June 22, 1976, stated: "An abstract [summary] of the Gershanovich study appeared in Cancer Therapy Abstracts (Vol. 16: No. 4 [19]75-2046), a journal published under contract to the NCI." This published abstract antedated the NCI's response to Congressman Hanley by more than six months. Thus, at the time the NCI was writing to Congressman Hanley that the Soviet data were negative, the NCI already knew these data were positive.

Why the deception?

What was the meaning of this misinformative response by the NCI?

Hydrazine sulfate was the first drug for generalized--any type of--cancer. It was developed by the Syracuse Cancer Research Institute, a small, private cancer research organization with an annual budget not exceeding $200,000. If you were a member of the House or Senate Appropriations Committees, would you authorize billions of dollars annually, as a result of the National Cancer Act of 1971, directly to the NCI--in the face of a small private laboratory which had just come up with the first useful drug for all cancers, on a budget of less than $200,000? You'd have to say "Whoa--let's reevaluate this whole situation."

Thus, in framing a deliberate lie to Congressman Hanley--in turning its guns against hydrazine sulfate--the NCI was fighting for its life. In perceiving hydrazine sulfate as a threat to its existence, the NCI was fighting to preserve its hegemony over the network of all cancer funds and its central position in the constellation of all cancer efforts.

As many readers of MedTruth know, over the ensuing years the NCI maintained its resistance to hydrazine sulfate, referring in cancer textbooks to the ever-enlarging Russian controlled clinical trials demonstrating statistically significant antitumor and anti-cachexia effects (see above) in otherwise unresponsive patients--as showing only "hints of subjective activity," while at the same time not even acknowledging the published Phase III randomized, double-blind Harbor-UCLA studies demonstrating, again statistically significantly, that hydrazine sulfate normalizes the abnormal metabolism associated with cancer cachexia--(i.e., associated with over 70 percent of all cancer deaths).

But not until 1989 did it occur to NCI that it would have to undertake controlled clinical trials of its own which might counter the Russian and Harbor-UCLA studies before the scientific and medical communities might believe its adversarial position on hydrazine sulfate. Accordingly, in 1989 NCI took over all clinical testing of hydrazine sulfate in the U.S., prohibiting (by grant denial) Harbor-UCLA--which up to that time had performed and published almost 10 years of increasingly positive studies on hydrazine sulfate--and by association any other U.S. cancer center from any further clinical study of hydrazine sulfate. Thus, in 1989 the NCI became the only player in the clinical testing of hydrazine sulfate within the United States.

The NCI sponsored three studies of hydrazine sulfate, parts of which were performed at various cancer centers and hospitals throughout the U.S. But before going further, it is necessary for you to become acquainted with the Helsinki Declaration.

The Helsinki Declaration--a multinational ratification of principles governing human biomedical research studies, to which the U.S. is a major signatory-- is an outgrowth of the Nuremberg Trials (Doctors Trial) following World War II which uncovered the heinous human medical "experiments" inflicted on helpless human beings by the Nazis, put in place to guarantee that no harmful procedures be used in patients undergoing experimental medical treatment. This document lies at the very heart of all clinical studies and informed consent--and as such represents the international "law of the land," requiring all human biomedical research to conform to its stated principles, and to so acknowledge in all experimental protocols and published studies.

All controlled clinical trials performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration indicate--without exception--the efficacy and safety of hydrazine sulfate. These include the 17 years of multicentric Phase II Russian studies and the 10 years of Harbor-UCLA randomized Phase III studies--performed by scientists considered among the most outstanding and experienced clinical cancer investigators in the world and published chiefly in leading U.S. peer-reviewed cancer and medical journals.

The only controlled clinical trials to indicate the non-efficacy of this drug were those sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. However, these were in violation of the Helsinki Declaration (the "generally accepted standards" rule) by virtue of their use of incompatible agents (medications) with the test drug and therefore declared by this Declaration to have no scientific standing. (Use of incompatible medication in the presence of a test drug can result in the grave illness--or death--of a patient, as well as cause a negative drug study. Use of incompatible agents in a drug study is virtually unknown in human biomedical testing.)

Most major media science writers and personnel are reluctant--even fearful--to touch this story. The idea that there could be an existent, effective cancer treatment--which the government refuses to acknowledge--is almost preposterous. But in those instances where reporters and other media representatives have made inquiries to the National Cancer Institute, stating their plans for a possible story on hydrazine sulfate, they receive the following type of reply:

"How could you perpetrate such a cruel hoax on the American people? You would be giving hundreds of thousands of people false hope."

Here is the 'cruel hoax': The combined Russian and Harbor-UCLA studies, the only controlled clinical trials performed in conformity with the Helsinki Declaration, state that of every million late-stage, unresponsive cancer patients treated with hydrazine sulfate, more than half a million would receive measurable symptomatic improvement, 400,000 would demonstrate a halt or regression in tumor growth, and some would go on to long term (> 10 years) "complete response," i.e., survival.

This 'cruel hoax' must out. NCI's well-kept 'secret' must out. The major media must have the courage to take on this difficult story and inform the American people that there is an effective cancer treatment out there, one that competently performed clinical trials have identified as capable of extending benefits to even very advanced cancer patients.

I am asking each of you who reads this communication to send a copy to anyone you know who has cancer, to anyone you know who may be in a position to majorly publicize--to "break"--this story. To your doctor. Your health care provider. To the earnest people in hospice who care for human beings in their last weeks and months of life. To your Congressmen and Congresswomen. Ask them to do something about this tragic situation which keeps really ill people from a drug which competently performed clinical studies say might help them and only incompetently performed studies say otherwise....

29 comments:

Winfield J. Abbe said...

While it is true that observation and experimentation are a central part of the Scientific Method, they are only one part of that process which involves many principles. Galileo
Galilei (1564-1642) from Pisa, Italy, the greatest physicist in the world, is usually credited to be the father of the Scientific Method. He made enormous contributions to virtually every branch of physics and astronomy.
The most comprehensive statements of the Scientific Method I have read are published in the book “Physics A Textbook for Colleges” by Professor Oscar M. Stewart, Ginn & Co., 1924-1944. This book was reviewed by Nobel Laureate Robert Millikan (1868-1953), from Morrison, Illinois, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1923 for his seminal experiment called “The Millikan Oil Drop Experiment” which proved that all electric charge exists in discrete units of the fundamental charge on an electron. That experiment can still be performed today about a century later on any kitchen table. The following statements are quoted from pages 756-760 “Notes on the Scientific Method” from this book.

“Fundamental Assumptions of the Scientific Method
1. The first assumption is that there exist certain ideas, or concepts, which are useful and apparently necessary tools in understanding nature. For example, such things as force, mass, energy, temperature, and electrical charge are fundamental concepts. These have been chosen through long experience, by keeping those that were useful and discarding those that were not.
2. The second assumption is that all physical or material things are governed by definite laws, or principles, which can be stated in terms of our fundamental concepts. The acceptance of this doctrine abolishes superstition and mysticism…
3. A third assumption is that the number of fundamental concepts and fundamental principles, or laws, is small. This assumption is sometimes called ‘the law of parsimony’…

Methods
4. The importance of accurate definitions.
5. The use of quantitative methods.
6. Explanations. Each student of science soon learns what a scientist means by ‘Explain’ or ‘Why.’ To a scientist an explanation is an attempt to show that the occurrence is a special case of one or more of the general principles…The habit of trying to explain things in terms of general principles is one of the important attitudes of a good scientist.
7. Experimentation. The basis of all knowledge is experience. In science it is experimentation. There is a vast difference between good experimentation and tinkering. A good experiment is one that adds something to our knowledge of facts or fundamental principles. Usually many different factors in an experiment may affect the results. It is always important to see to it that the conditions of the experiment are so controlled that there are no concealed factors and that the influence of all except those under direct test is reduced to a minimum… It is important to remember that experimentation is one of the best tests of the truth. One should never accept a statement of facts unless he feels confident that it is in agreement with experiment. Practically all the common superstitions can be tested experimentally. Correct and accurate observation is one of the first demands of science. There are three tests of the value of any set of observations:
a. Reproducibility. Different observers obtain results which agree.
b. Agreement and congruity of observations with each other.
c. Utility of observations in establishing principles or in supporting theories.
8. The formulation of principles.
9. Tests of laws. a. A statement of a law, or principle, must follow by rigorous reasoning from accepted principles. b. The law must be verified directly or indirectly by numerous experiments.
10. Theories of Processes.
11. Theoretical Physics.
Continued below:

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Continued from above:
12. Intellectual Honesty.In the interpretation of observations and in the acceptance of principles a maximum amount of fairness and open-mindedness is essential. Prejudice must not enter. Furthermore, one should never make up one’s mind so positively that it is impossible to change it….
13. A summary of the fundamental habits necessary in using a scientific attitude toward a problem. (Adapted from V. H. Noll.) a. the habit of accuracy; b. the habit of intellectual honesty; c. the habit of open-mindedness; d. the habit of suspended judgment; e. the habit of looking for cause and effect relations; f. the habit of criticism, including self-criticism. If a person carries all these habits over into the solutions of everyday problems he meets, he is using a scientific attitude.”

Few students, even college graduates and even university professors and researchers truly follow all these principles. Many “scientists” often have conflicts of interest usually revolving around money and who is paying for their “research”. For example, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is a corrupt cesspool, bought and paid for by food processing companies and drug companies. This is documented in numerous books and articles. The important thing for young students to always remember is that no matter what others may do, even your “teachers”, you are always responsible for rigorously following the above rules 24 hours a day of your life. If you do you will be a good scientist and a good citizen too. If you violate the above rules do so at your peril as if you violate the laws of physics.
As Dr. Gold has clearly demonstrated, the NIH and the NCI have clearly violated these rules.
Many of these "scientists" hold Ph.D. degrees. They have betrayed the public trust. They have sold out humanity for money. Shame is too polite a word to describe their unconscionable behavior which continues unpunished and virtually unchallenged by the ignorant cowards in the U.S. Congress.

Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962
Ph.D., Physics UC Riverside, 1966
Low Temperature Experimental Physics and Theoretical Elementary Particle Physics.
150 Raintree Ct.
Athens, GA 30607
wjabbe@aol.com

Winfield J. Abbe said...

The above moving statement by Dr. Gold regarding the lies about hydrazine sulfate by government agencies and the officials running them is also supported by a quotation by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. in his book "The Cancer Industry", Equinox Press, N.Y., 1996, also published under various names in 1989 and 1980. About 23 pages are devoted to this subject in his book.
In the 1989 version on page 191, he quotes Dean Burk, Ph.D., former head of cell chemistry at the NCI and himself a genius level scientist and former member of the Palace of Cell Physiology operated by Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D in Germany.
"In mid-August 1973, Burk met with top officials of Sloan-Kettering Institute in New York to tell them about hydrazine's successes..:
Let me tell you this perfectly true story. There is nothing mystical or poetic about it-and I could give you many (such stories).
A woman with Hodgkin's disease who had been flat on her back for seven weeks, who had no appetitie and who had lost all her weight-a 'paper thin' patient-took hydrazine sulfate. One week later she was shopping in the grocery store with her own bag; five days later she was spending most of the day in her garden. I don't give you that as any miraculous story-it is simply the plain truth (Burk, 1974)."

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Yes, the American Cancer Society and local hospitals and their duped supporters would lie to unwitting cancer patients.
I just placed this statement to this blog on this subject:http://www.topix.com/forum/city/athens-ga/TUSI0HDTNJTMF8Q6T#lastPost

On Friday October 30, 2009, the Athens Banner Herald published another propaganda pink supplement on cancer, paid for by the American Cancer Society, two local hospitals and duped businesses, with the name of Pamela A. Keene who operates Pamela A. Keene Public Relations, Inc. on it. Here is a statement from page 1 of this supplement which is not on the website of the ABH and therefore comments to it are not possible there:
"Another common myth is that eating sugar and simple carbohydrates feeds, or accelerates, breast cancer.'While it's true that people with any kind of cancer should follow a healthy diet, sugar has not been shown to exacerbate breast-or any other cancer,' Nemetz says..." Nemetz is Susan Nemetz an oncology nurse at Athens Regional Medical Center.
Here is quotation from the recent book "The Hidden Story of Cancer" by Brian Peskin and Amid Habib, M.D., Pinnacle Press, Houston, 2006-2008, page 245:
"Cancer's Prime Fuel-Carbohydrates"

"You may be shocked to know that the prime 'food' of a cancer cell is glucose-thats right, sugar. Diet-wise, dietary carbohydrate is broken down by your body to glucose. Your body does not break down dietary fat or protein to glucose. The popular publications rarely tell you that a cancer cell can't live on either fats or proteins, like normal cells can.
Therefore once cancer has begun to develop even a little, carbohydrate consumption can only worsen the cancer because it provides the sugar the cancer cells need to live on. Any cancer patient should adhere to a high-protein, low carbohydrate diet.
The fact that cancer cells idolize sugar is well-known. It was reported in 'The Insulin Connection', by
Brenda Goodman in U.S. News and World Report, September 5, 2005, pages 60-62 that:
'...Cancer cells have six to ten times the number of insulin receptors...So, if extra hormone hits a pre-existing cancer cell, it makes a bad thing much worse.
'For cancer, insulin is like pouring gasoline on a fire,' says Pamela Goodwin, director of the Marvelle Koffler Breast Cancer Center at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto.'"
The above statement by Pamela A. Keene is absolutely, patently, 100% false and wrong and seeks to fool unwitting cancer patients.
I wonder how much money Ms. Keene was paid for signing her name to this patently false statement to mislead unwitting cancer patients?
Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph. D., the genius in Germany, was the first scientist to prove that all cancers metabolize via anerobic glycolysis or sugar in the absence of oxygen. This is an experimental fact, not speculation. It is unconscionable that the ignorant editors of the Athens Banner Herald would publish such a patently false statement to mislead unwitting cancer patients. Shame, shame, shame on them and Ms. Keene and Ms. Nemetz.
All this shows, in addition to numerous other books and articles, how the American Cancer Society cynically acts against the interest of unwitting cancer patients and their loved ones, in what must be the biggest medical fraud of our time.

Winfield J. Abbe said...

"At Public Universities-Less for More" by Paul Fain was published today in the NYTimes. Here are my comments to this propaganda piece:
The author of this propaganda article is nothing but a propagandist for the Chronicle of \"Higher\" Education which constantly promotes more warm bodies to justify the jobs for tenured faculty in those institutions around the country.

In the first place everybody does not deserve or need or justify a place at a college or university. There are not enough jobs for all these college graduates anyway, who have lowered the standards over the years. The 1939 book \"How to Read a Book\" by Mortimer Adler, Ph.D. stated that students then could not read past the 6th grade level. What do you think it has degenerated to today? The American system of \"higher\" education is a dismal failure. Just look at who their \"educated\" folks elect to public office and how easily they are duped on vital public issues, like the total and dismal failure of the wars on drugs, on cancer, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, the corrupt government institutions like the NIH, NCI and FDA, the latter of which is bought and paid for by food processing companies and drug companies.

We also need skilled workers in numerous other areas not addressed by colleges and universities, whose graduates can hardly change a spare tire on their own car, let alone do anything else useful. If so-called \"higher\" education were a success, our population would not be so easily fooled by lies of the media. The fact that most citizens choose entertainment over serious issues proves the total and dismal failure of higher education which is in reality indoctrination and propaganda. Do not donate one dime more of your hard earned money to the higher eduation cesspool. Let these good for nothing students go abroad for their education as many of them have been mooching on us for it here for years. The only reason for higher eduation here is for one to say they graduated from XYZ university. Who cares anyway?

Most of these college graduates do not even know what the scientific method is, let alone follow it if they have an advanced or any degree. Our institutions of lower education are a total, unequivocal, dismal failure. Let them die a natural death. All anyone has to do to become educated is to read, read and read and not become brainwashed by prejudiced, ignorant so-called \"professors\".

The war on cancer is the best example for the total failure of public education. Over $100 billion, up to a trillion by some estimates, squandered by the cancer generals, and they cannot even tell you what cancer is, let alone how to treat and prevent it in the human body. The orthodox cancer treatment in the U.S. is the biggest scam in the world today. It is nothing but fraud and medical quackery as the average college graduate cheers it up marching in foolish parades and fundraisers to give more money to be wasted down a rathole. Higher education is a total, dismal failure.

Winfield J. Abbe said...

On October 23, 2009, the public relations propagandist one Pamela A. Keene of Pamela A. Keene Public Relations Inc. produced another 4 page pink paper paid for by the American Cancer Society, and two local hospitals, Athens Regional Medical Center, Inc. and St. Mary's hospital and likely some unnamed phantom supporters too.
This particular one focuses on the cost of cancer and contains some redeeming information compared to the other misleading articles.
Ms. Keene gives an example of a breast cancer victim who, even with insurance, ended up deep in debt although precise amounts of money are not mentioned, except for co payments for doctor's visits of $ 30.00 and a $ 1,500 deductible for insurance. While it may help to have friends to commiserate with, few of them will pony up the many thousands of dollars to help. Doctors also will not provide free treatment; no one gets in the door without money paid in advance. She quotes
an employee of the American Cancer Society which she touts for help: "'The reality is that it's possible that a cancer patient may lose her home', Powell says. 'I wish I had a good answer. A person with good savings can go through their money pretty quickly.'" In other words, even the touted ACS, is not going to pony up the many thousands of dollars required for "treatment", mistreatment might be a more appropriate description.
Then she mentions a foundation for help but then notes that it only provides up to $ 500 per patient. This is trivial for a cancer patient. The total costs for my wife's experience ran up to $ 300,000! So, if you get cancer, be prepared to bankrupt yourself. And while you can go to the emergency room and see a doctor one time, don't expect them to pay for continuing cancer treatment for you or anyone else. Even the local cities and hospitals draw the line with cancer, the costs are so high.
With cancer money runs the show and this is the bottom line of why the entire subject is a corrupt cesspool. Everybody involved is making so much money there is no reason to stop it with prevention. For every "survivor" shown by a picture and propaganda words by Mr. Keene, there may be hundreds or thousands of others in cemeteries. Many of them were even killed, not from the cancer but the treatments. All orthodox approved cancer treatments in the U.S. are life threatening. Fortunately for all the doctors and "caregivers" involved, the only reason they are not charged with accessories to murder is because it is so difficult to prove and no independent pathology laboratory is performing autopsies on dead cancer victims to prove how and why they died, from the cancer, from a hole in their colon from the chemo"therapy", from radiation poisoning, from contamination or incompetent surgery, or you might even get cancer from a mammogram, etc. This is why cheap propaganda like these article are so misleading and insidious. They fail to mention any of this, not to mention the fraud in medical research itself and fraud in the approval or denial of drugs to treat cancer or the total dismal failure of the criminals at the FDA to approve numerous known vitamins and minerals to prevent cancer, like Vitamin C which has been proved to kill cancer cells at high doses since 1969 or the mineral Selenium for which there is a literal mountain of evidence that it protects against cancer just like Iodine protects atainst goitre. For example see the article "The Legcy of Wayne Martin" by E. J. Hoffman in Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients Feb./March, 2009 or his book "Cancer and the Search for Selective Biochemical Inhibitors", CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2nd. Ed., 2007, or "The Truth About Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks" by Joseph Gold, M.D. at www.hydrazinesulfate.org.
Continued below:

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Continued from above
Everyone should observe that despite the propagana about the "caring" medical "profession", no one receives continuing cancer treatment, let alone competent cancer treatment, for free. Money must be paid and in most cases must be paid before the door to the treatment room, will be opened, and despite the fact that most of the treatment is little more than medical quackery at its best. If you have cancer, and no insurance, be prepared to bankrupt yourself unless you have large financial resources. Money is at the bottom of the cancer treatment nightmare problem. We have enough information now, today, 2009, to prevent most cancer. Over a hundred billion dollars has been squandered by the cancer generals and they cannot even tell you scientifically what cancer is, let alone how to treat and prevent the disease. They must be fired and prosecuted for scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity.

Winfield J. Abbe said...

From: wjabbe@aol.com
To: bettye.miller@ucr.edu;
Subject: Your propaganda article "What's the big idea?"
Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 8:30 pm

Dear Ms. Miller: These comments are to your recent article "What's The Big Idea", UCR Magazine, Fall, 2009, page 8. The so-called war on cancer has been going on now since 1971, about 38 years. A recent NYTimes article estimated its cost so far at about $105 billion. Other estimates reach as high as the trillions of public and private dollars. Yet, despite this enormous expenditure of money and resources, the cancer generals cannot even provide us a scientific explanation of the cause of cancer let alone how to cure and prevent the disease. At the beginning of the war on cancer about 300,000 victims died each year either from the cancer, treatment or both. (Note that all approved orthodox cancer treatments are life threatening so that if a victim dies while under treatment one never knows for sure if they died of the cancer or the treatment or both.) Today, the number is over half a million and rising each year. By any standard of "success" this is dismal failure. Something is very very wrong isn't it?
How long should such a situation be tolerated by a gullible and unwitting public Ms. Miller? Another decade, another century, ten more centuries before the cancer generals can finally inform us lowly duped citizens the cause of cancer and how cure to prevent it?
Most of this "research" was performed in university and government laboratories like the ones you extol in your article, but which fails to mention this gross, massvie failure of our time. What happened? "Who done it"? In failing to mention this total, dismal failure of mostly university and government research are not you in patent violation of your stated "Objectives" to present all sides of issues objectively? Are not you only interested in one sided propaganda to promote your cause for public relations purposes?
How long would you, Ms. Miller, continue to pay a mechanic who continually failed to fix your broken car or washing machine or television or furnace or air conditioning compressor or whatever? Would you continue to pay and pay and pay forever without question if they continually failed? Are you that stupid? Have you read any critical articles about this subject? Here are a few examples:

"The Truth About Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks" by Joseph Gold, M.D., www.hydrazinesulfate.org.
"The Hidden Story of Cancer" by Brian Peskin and Amid Habib, M.D., Pinnacle Press, Houston, 2006-2008.
"Cancer and the Search for Selective Biochemical Inhibitors" by E.J. Hoffman, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2nd Ed., 2007.
"American Cancer Society America's Wealthiest 'Non-Profit' Institution" by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., International Journal of Health Services, 1999 also available at www. preventcancer.com.
"The Cancer Industry" by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D., Equinox Press, N.Y., 1996, also published in 1989 and 1980 with about 500 references.
"Cancer and Vitamin C Therapy for Patients" by Reagan Houston, Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Aug./Sept., 2007
Many more references could be provided..

Did you know that it has been known since 1969 that vitamin C at high doses kills cancer cells? Yet the FDA has still only approved it at the dose of 60 milligrams per day for the prevention of scurvy! There is no money to be made by drug companies with vitamin C is there Ms. Miller? All you propaganda artists, along with your so-called "professor" and "dean" and "chancellor"... supervisors, need to go back to school and learn to read again if you ever did. The University of California is no longer the crown jewel of higher education; it has obviously degenerated into a cesspool of indoctrination and brainwashing and propaganda aided and abetted by you and your cronies in these meaningless and misleading propaganda articles to fool a gullible and unwitting public to give you money. Evidently they learned their lessons well from Joseph Paul Goebbels in Nazi, Germany.


Continued below:

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Continued from above:

Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962.
Ph.D., Physics, UC Riverside, 1966.
150 Raintree Ct.
Athens, GA 30607
Formerly of Sierra Madre, California

P.S. Is it not arrogant, to say the least, for UCR to request billions of dollars from the taxpayers for a new medical school when the State of California is bankrupt? If any major disaster happens and the bankrupt California cannot deal with it since it is basically bankrupt, who will they turn to for aid? Why the federal government of course won't they? What if a major earthquake, which is long overdue now, happens tomorrow? In other words, the good citizens of California will expect and demand the people of the rest of the county pay for their gross negligence and failure to maintain fiscal responsibility.

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Today November 9, 2009, aol news had an article "Woman allegedly fakes cancer" about a woman in Texas who was charged with theft by deception and fraud. Here is my comment to this article:
Funny, the American Cancer Society makes false and misleading statements all the time and raises millions of dollars but none of them are ever charged let alone prosecuted for these crimes. The cancer generals of the war on cancer constantly make misleading and false statements regarding the efficacy of their quack treatments. In fact, orthodox cancer treatment, mistreatment would be a more appropriate word, is the biggest scam in the world today, yet none of them are prosecuted for the medical quackery they are responsible for on a massive scale. Here is a link that has numerous references and documentation of these statements: "Criminal FDA Must be charged with cancer quackery" at
http://www.topix.net/forum/city/bethesda-md/TIO9PHV8MJ0HUFBAD. Over half a million victims die every year either from cancer, treatment or both, usually treatment.
Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
Ph.D., Physics, UC Riverside, 1966
Athens, GA
wjabbe@aol.com

Winfield J. Abbe said...

If you were not convinced that Gina Kolata was little more than a cheerleader for the failed cancer industry, her current propaganda piece in the New York Times should convince you at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/health/research/13prevent.html?_r=1&em.

Ms. Kolata only talks to members of the group of cancer researchers which have failed so miserably now for so long . She carefully avoids mentioning that Vitamin C kills cancer cells at high doses, a fact discovered and reported two years before the failed war on cancer was started in 1969. While there is a literal mountain of evidence that the mineral selenium prevents all types of cancer, she only quotes prejudiced studies by the prejudiced non scientists in the medical orthodoxy who falsify data to “prove” otherwise.
Obviously they do not want to stop the money machine with cancer prevention.
Drug prevention and machine prevention is all Ms. Kolata can comprehend. The doctors recommended that my wife take Tamoxifen following her inflammatory breast cancer about ten years ago, but fortunately she took my advice and did not take it. Had she done so her life and quality of life would likely have been lessened and she might have even contracted uterine cancer. She also saved many thousands of dollars for her insurance companies and for us too. So far she is a success story without this worthless and dangerous drug.
Ms Kolata obviously has not read the numerous books and articles that document fraud and corruption and falsifying scientific data, such as that provided by Dr. Joseph Gold, M.D. at www.hydrazinesulfate.org, in the failed war on cancer since she routinely fails to mention any of it, beginning with the “scientist” at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York years ago who painted spots on the backs of lab rats in order to fool others about their worthless cancer research. Yet she continues to act as a cheerleader for all this medical quackery and corruption with billions of dollars of public and private money. Ms Kolata obviously loves to fool herself and others too. Just remember, Ms. Kolata, one day you may be one of the victims you and your employer have so vigorously sought to fool.
The war on cancer is the biggest scam in the world today. The cancer generals of that war obviously do not know what they are doing. They routinely approve quack drugs and medical treatments that even kill patients from the treatment. Obviously if you kill the patient you kill the cancer. That seems to be the business and medical model of the cancer generals. Many years ago a distinguished professor of medical physics and physiology and an expert in medical statistics at UC Berkeley, Hardin Jones, Ph.D., proved that those who refused any of the orthodox cancer treatments lived up to 4 times longer than those who were treated.. Nothing has changed today. Cancer treatment is the biggest scam in the world today. It makes huge amounts of money for all involved while bankrupting the patients and their insurance companies. Shame, shame, shame on Ms. Kolata and her reprehensible employer the NYTimes for their continual denial of these indisputable facts. Numerous references have been provided here and elsewhere to prove these statements. Unfortunately Ms. Kolata and her employer choose to violate all the rules of journalism and fail to read the and continue to keep themselves ignorant. Ignorance is bliss isn't it Ms. Kolata and NYTimes editors. Why would you keep quoting those who have failed so dismally and miserably for so long?

Winfield J. Abbe said...

These comments relate to the current article by the government cheerleader in the NY Times about mammography:
Some of these comments show how brainwashed most women are about the efficacy of mammograms versus other means of detecting cancer. I read only one post wich mentioned thermography. While a number of posters did mention self examination, virtually none questioned mammograms although some criticized them as being painful or causing discomfort.
First, everyone should remember that mammograms are high energy x- rays sent directly into the tissue. X-rays can harm tissue and yes, even cause cancer itself. This has been known for many years. So, the higher the frequency of mammograms the higher the probability they may be the cause of the breast cancer you fear! Think about that. Your breast cancer could be caused by the x-rays used to detect it and your doctor and the medical orthodoxy recommended the procedure. Naturally the medical orthodoxy does not want to admit a procedure recommended by them causes cancer itself (iatrogenically caused or doctor caused).
Even if your doctor claims the probability of contracting cancer from a single mammogram is small, unlikely events happen every day don't they? After all, the probability of winning the lottery is small too, isn't it, but someone usually wins every day? It is unlikely to be struck by lightening but people die from this every day.
Second, it has been known since 1928, when medical articles were first published in the medical literature about it, that pressing hard on the breasts may in fact spread any existing cancer around and cause it to spread to other organs. A number of posters have complained about this and how painful it was and how they dreaded a mammogram.
There are other just as effective or more effective ways to detect breast cancer than mammography. Responsible medical doctors like Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. have disussed them. But mammography is a well established business and makes big money for the cancer industry. The equipment cost many millions of dollars. Do you think a doctor is going to invest in a million dollar machine and then fail to recommend his patients use that machine especially when the cancer generals support his decision to use that machine, and when it is virtually impossible for a cancer victim to prove he or she contracted breast cancer from the use of that machine or possibly had existing cancer spread around by the hard pressure exerted on the breasts during the procedure? For some references on this subject see www.preventcancer.oom and other articles by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. on this subject.
These articles by the cheerleader of the cancer generals, Ms. Kolata, further prove that the cancer generals do not know what they are doing after squandering multi billions of public and private dollars. They can't even tell you what cancer is, let alone how to cure and prevent it. Everyone is virtually on their own and must become their own doctor. Everyone must become their own expert since no expert can be believed due to confliscts of interest and corruption and violations of the scientific method. Rather than protecting the public from medical quackery with the power of government, the power of government is corruptly used to sanction it everywhere. It is like the situation that existed and still exists with stomach ulcers and the medical orthodoxy did not understand they were caused by a bacterial infection and most medical doctors killed or harmed millions of unwitting patients due to the power and ignorance of the medical orthodoxy. Some still do. The same is true today with the cancer generals of the failed war on cancer. They do not know what they are doing and should be charged with scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity by the U.S. Justice Department.

Continued below:

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Continued from above:
By the way, anyone who believes the cancer generals at the NIH, NCI and FDA objectively evaluate different proposals fairly and objectively according to the scientific method, just read the article by Joseph Gold, M.D. "The Truth About Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks" at www.hydrazinesulfate.org. Incidently, it has been known since 1969, two years before the war on cancer was begun, that Vitamin C at high doses kills cancer cells; yet the FDA has only approved its use in the tiny amount of 60 milligrams per day to prevent the disease of scurvy! Tens to hundreds of grams of Vitamin C are necessary to be maintained in the human body to prevent cancer and the human body does not manufacture it like most higher animals do. Take your heads out of the sand folks; your government protectors are not your protectors at all, but your killers. They learned well from their teachers in Nazi, Germany some of our brave ancestors fought so hard to rid the world of.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA

Winfield J. Abbe said...

“Breaching a barrier to fight brain cancer” by Dinese Grady is the title of the latest propaganda article by the NYTimes promoting the failed war on cancer in the U.S. Nov. 17, 2009.
Cancer patients are all very desperate individuals. They will agree to almost anything if told it might cure them of their cancer if they indeed have cancer. The concept of “informed consent” is virtually meaningless with any cancer patient.
Furthermore if anyone outside the medical orthodoxy seeks to perform any “unproved” procedure or treatment, they are required to prove efficacy or proof of success before treatment will be approved by the Gestapo FDA or NIH or NCI, which it never is. However, if any orthodox medical “doctor” seeks to do experimental procedures, like the ones described in this article, that are also totally unproven and which efficacy has not only not been proved, but a patient already died evidently from the procedures as described in the article, rather than labeling this as medical fraud and quackery as the criminals at the FDA routinely do for alternative medicine, this is called “experimental studies” and sanctioned by the same criminals that outlaw anyone else from doing exactly the same thing! Absolutely no proof of efficacy was demonstrated before these described experiments with unwitting brain cancer patients were performed as required of all alternative medicine proponents. Only the “doctors”, if they can be called that, that are licensed by the criminals in the medical orthodoxy of the U.S. are authorized to basically experiment with unwitting cancer victims who obviously would agree to anything; there is no such thing as “informed” consent in such situations.
Everyone should also observe that these cancer quacks in the medical orthodoxy are only seeking to use dangerous and unproven drugs for their experiments, as they totally disregard the experiments and facts of the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D., who proved that all cancer cells metabolize by anerobic glycolysis, and as they also disregard the experiments and facts proving that Vitamin C at high doses of the order of grams to hundreds of grams kills cancer cells, known since 1969, two years before the war on cancer was even begun! It is obvious that the cancer generals do not know what they are doing and must not only be fired, but prosecuted for scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity. Shame, shame shame on them who have no conscience. “Conscience doth make cowards of us all”.
When you are engaged in medical quackery and fraud, it helps to have powerful media partners aiding and abetting you in fleecing and fooling a gullible and unwitting and stupid American Public. Anyone who foolishly believes the cancer generals are objectively looking at all scientific aspects of the cancer problem must read the article “The Truth about Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks” by Joseph Gold, M.D. at www.hydrazinesulfate.org.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Comment to an Op-Ed piece "The Breast Brouhaha" by Gail Collins, NYTimes Nov. 19, 2009:
This is a completely unenlightening article. The NYTimes editors and writers obviously have their heads in the sand and refuse to acknowlege the fact that the cancer generals clearly do not know what they are doing and no longer deserve any artificial protection from a cowardly and lying media. The gloves must be taken off and soon.
Multi billions of public and private dollars squandered on a failed war on cancer and the cancer generals not only are unable to tell us what cancer is scientifically, but cannot tell us how to cure and prevent cancer in the human body either. They routinely violate the scientific method by disregarding the experiments and facts of the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. while falsifying data to obstruct anyone outside the medical orthodoxy who seeks to use natural substances like Vitamin C to cure and prevent cancer or selemium to prevent it like iodine prevents goitre or cheap and inexpensive drugs to aid patients like hydrazine sulfate obstructed by the non scientists at the NIH, NCI and FDA who lied about it on a government website. It has been known since 1969 that Vitamin C kills cancer cells at high doses of the order of grams or more. See www.hydrazinesulfate.org by Joseph Gold, M.D. The cancer industry is a cesspool. The American public has been brainwashed by the failed media, like the NYTimes for so long, they don't know up from down or right from wrong and are impotent to distinguish failure from success. Their "higher" education failed to instill any critical abilities in them. But if you continue to spend enormous sums of money and enormous numbers of cancer victims continue to be harmed and die, often from the toxic treatments themselves, this is clear failure, not success. The cancer generals obviously do not know what they are doing.
Adolph Hitler once said that "the people will more readily accept a big lie than a small one". The big lie in America today, 2009 is that the war on cancer is not a failure. How long do we as a society, continue to reward failure? America is, or should be, about success not failure. This is why the cancer generals must not only be fired, but prosecuted for scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity. Most Americans would not continue to reward failure in other aspects of their lives; why continue to reward the failed criminal cancer generals?

Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Comment to NYTimes article "Regents Set to Raise Tuition in California by 32%" by Tamar Lewin, Nov. 19, 2009:
I grew up in Sierra Madre, California, near Pasadena in the foothills just below Mt. Wilson. The State of my childhood is now basically bankrupt in more ways than just fiscally. My alma mater, the once crown jewel of "higher" education is no more a jewel in the crown. It has become a politically correct cesspool with a student body largely from foreign countries and a research faculty corrupted by federal dollars.
Most of them will do anything for federal government money. Rather than leaders in basic research in cancer, for example, they are followers blindly following the blind failed genetics research of the cancer generals of the war on cancer, and violating the scientific method by neglecting the experiments and facts of the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. whom most of the "professors" there have either not heard of or failed to read his hundreds of scientific papers and formed prejudiced opinions based on hearsay and innuendo from other non scientists.
John LeConte, M.D. "Father of the University of California", from Savannah, Georgia, who was first president and first professor of physics at UC Berkeley in 1868, would be ashamed at what has transpired at his legacy. Despite their basic bankruptcy the selfish groups at UC Riverside still demand a new medical school; this must be revoked and cancelled immediately. This proposed medical school will still provide that pre med students be treated to a watered down set of introductory physics classes as has been done for roughly the past 50 years. It was approved just before the fall last year in June, 2008. Because, as usual, you know who will be expected to pony up to bail California out of their bankruptcy: The rest of us of course. The orgy is over citizens of California. You must get your act together and begin paying your bills and living like ordinary citizens for a change. Unfortunately, if California falls, it may take down the rest of us too. Shame, shame, shame on California for failing to get its act in order.
Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962
Ph.D., Physics, UC Riverside, 1966

Winfield J. Abbe said...

The following comment relates to the article in Scientific American at this link:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=origin-of-life-on-earth

It is really amazing that in the above unenlightening and prejudiced and propaganda article about the so-called "origins of life" in Non Scientific American, the word "oxygen" is virtually non existent. How could anyone write an ariticle about the origins of life without even mentioning oxygen on which every higher life form depends without exception?
These people masquerade as "scientists"?
Here is part of a quoted statement by the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. (1883-1970) from "The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer", August 1966 Revision of June30, 1966 Lindau Nobel-Laureates Conference Lectures as quoted in "The Hidden Story of Cancer" by Brian Peskin and Amid Habib, M.D., Pinnacle Press, Houston, 2006-2008, pp. 446-447:
"If a lowered oxygen pressure during cell growth may cause cancer, or, more generally, if any inhibition of respiration during growth may cause cancer, then the next problem is to show why reduced respiration induces cancer. Since we already know that with a lowering of respiration fermentation results, we can re-express our question: Why does cancer result if oxygen-respiration is replaced by fermentation?
The early history of life on our planet indicates that life existed on earth before the earth's atmosphere contained free oxygen gas. The living cells must therefore have been fermenting cells then, and, as fossils show, they were undifferentiated single cells. Only when free oxygen appeared in the atmosphere-some billion years ago-did the higher development of life set in, to produce the plant and animal kingdoms from the fermenting, undifferentiated single cells. What the philosophers of life have called 'The Evolution Creatrice' has been and is therefore the work of oxygen.
The reverse process, the dedifferentiation of life, takes place today in greatest amount before our eyes in cancer development, which is another expression for dedifferention. To be sure, cancer development takes place even in the presence of free oxygen gas in the atmosphere, but this oxygen may not penetrate in sufficient quantitiy in to the growing body cells, or the respiratory apo-enzymes of the growing body cells may not be saturated with the active groups..."

Winfield J. Abbe said...

A genius level scientist and medical doctor died May 27, 2009. Everyone should read the last interview of him:
An Interview with Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D., 1917-2009 by Andrew W. Saul

http://www.townsendletter.com/Nov2009/hoffer1109.html

Here is a brief quotation from the interview:

“Some years ago, as I sat at lunch with Dr. Abram Hoffer, I took some vitamin pills. Dr. Hoffer leaned over towards me and said, "You know, you're going to live a lot longer if you take those." As I looked at him, he added, "I guarantee it. If you don't, come back and tell me."

So said the founding father of orthomolecular medicine.

It was nearly 60 years ago when Abram Hoffer and his colleagues began curing schizophrenia with niacin. While some physicians are still waiting, those who have used niacin with patients and families know the immense practical value of what Dr. Hoffer discovered. Abram Hoffer's life has not merely changed the face of psychiatry. He has changed the course of medicine for all time. His 30 books, 600 scientific papers, and thousands of cured patients have yet to convince orthodox medicine. Dr. Hoffer has said that it takes about two generations before a truly new medical idea is accepted. Perhaps in the case of megavitamin therapy, maybe it is three generations…”

Winfield J. Abbe said...

On November 30, 2009
AOL news published an article “Magnetic Disks Could Kill Cancer Cells”at this link;
http://webmail.aol.com/29202/aol-1/en-us/Suit... . Here is my reply to this claim:

It has been known since 1969, two years before the so-called war on cancer was declared by President Nixon, that Vitamin C at high doses kills cancer cells. The exact chemical mechanism for this is also known. The Vitamin C is brought into the cells via the glycolysis they operate by, and forms hydrogen peroxide, which kills the cancer cells.
All cancer cells metabolize by anerobic glycolysis as proved by the experiments and facts of Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D., the genius in Germany many years ago.
Here is a current reference with all the facts about this wonderful discovery which has been negligently disregarded by the criminals running the war on cancer:
“Cancer and Vitamin C Therapy for Patients” by Reagan Houston, Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Aug./Sept. 2007, page 92. This article contains the original reference to the research which proved Vitamin C kills cancer cells, and a recent reference where it was used to treat terminally ill cancer patients successfully.
This is all about money. There is no money for quack doctors and quack medical treatments if cancer can be cured by a vitamin is there? Americans need to wake up from the football games on television and stop being fooled by the criminals running the failed war on cancer.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA

Winfield J. Abbe said...

The following comments were made to the article “Look Past Controversy on Mammograms” by Mary Sanchez, Athens Banner Herald, Dec. 1, 2009 at
http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/120109/opi_530578654.shtml#mdw-comments
There are two main points about mammograms that all women (and some men too who also get breast cancer) must keep in mind. First, all of them involve injecting high energy x-rays into body tissue by medical "professionals". It has been known for many years that x-rays can cause cancer. Of course, fortunately for the doctors with the machines doing this, and receiving money for payment after administering this "treatment", it is virtually impossible to prove that cancer was initiated by such a procedure. And even if the probability for such an event is low, unlikely events happen every day like people winning the lottery.
Second, it was first published in the medical literature in about 1928 that pressing hard on the breasts, as they do during such a procedure as confirmed by any victim who has had it, can cause any cancer to be spread around. This is another reason for not doing it.
But if you owned a machine that cost upwards of a million dollars and the FDA approved its use for this "medical" purpose, wouldn't you use it too as often as possible, especially if unwitting patients couldn't prove any harm that might have been caused by its use, even possible breast cancer or its "spreading around"? Many other ways are equally or more effective in detecting cancer as described by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. and others. See www.preventcancer.com. Like most of the quack medical "treatments" in the cancer industry, mammography is another one that makes good money for all the medical "professionals" involved, and money is what it is all about. Funny, isn't it, how everyone must become their own "expert" in cancer? You can't rely on anything anyone says, especially medical doctors and the lying cancer generals of the failed war on cancer. Over a hundred billion of public and private dollars have been squandered now for almost 40 years and still about one person every minute dies either from cancer, treatment or both, usually treatment. It has been known since two years before the war on cancer was begun in 1971, that Vitamin C at high doses kills cancer cells and even the chemical mechanism for this is known; the Vitamin C is drawn into the cancer cells via their anerobic glycolysis, which then forms hydrogen peroxide and kills the cancer cells. The criminal cancer generals have negligently disregarded this information since it was first published in 1969. Here is an article about how this has been demonstrated to work: "Cancer and Vitamin C Therapy for Patients" by Reagan Houston, Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Aug./SEpt., 2007, page 92.
As Adolph Hitler stated many decades ago, "People will more readily believe a big lie than a small one". And, the best way to tell a lie is with statistics that no one can disprove. Americans have been so brainwashed by the cancer industry, they cannot tell what is right and what is wrong or what is a lie or what is not.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
150 Raintree Ct.
Athens, GA
wjabbe@aol.com

Winfield J. Abbe said...

The Cancer Industry cheerleaders are out today Dec. 7, 2009, first in the Wall Street Journal, then in USA Today by Liz Szabo and likely in others as the night rolls on. The big headline is "Cancer Rates are Dropping". But when you read the small print the amounts they are dropping are small, little more than errors in misleading statistical data that no one else is able to check.
Over a century ago the genius level American writer, one of the world's greatest writers, who used the nom de plume Mark Twain, but who was in reality Samuel Clemens, made a very enlightening observation about statistics although he himself was not an "expert" in mathematics: "There are lies, damn lies and statistics".
The best way to tell a lie is with statistics, especially like those of the NIH and ACS that no one could possibly dispute. These agencies are experts at propaganda and lying to a gullible and unwitting public. After all, they have been convincing a duped American public that over a hundred billion dollars of public and private money squandered on the failed war on cancer for decades is not in vain. They learned well from their teacher, Joseph Paul Goebbels, Adolph Hitler's right hand man who wrote the book on fooling people in Nazi, Germany, so many brave ancestors fought so hard to rid the world of.
Don't trust anything these agencies say. It is sort of like the joke about the father who helps his young son down a ladder, dropping him and allowing him to fall to the ground: "Don't trust anyone", especially the NIH, NCI, ACS or the FDA. All are pathological liars.

Winfield J. Abbe said...

The cheerleaders for the failed war on cancer are most recently finally talking about the dangers posed by the numerous and often unnecessary medical procedures involving CT scans, x-rays and others that provide radiation to the body and increase risk of cancer, even mammograms themselves. John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. warned of this about 15 years ago but was ridiculed by the American Cancer Society and others for doing so. He name is now long forgotten and not mentioned or given credit in the current propagand articles. So is Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. who also warned of this risk.
Here is a quote by the LA Times ariticle today by Thomas Maugh:
"There is little that individual patients can do about the vagaries of doses delivered by different machines.

But they do need to be their own advocates, said Dr. Rosaleen Parsons, chair of the department of diagnostic imaging at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia.

Patients should keep their own records of the number of scans they have received, question why repeat studies are necessary and argue for other types of imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, to minimize exposure to radiation, she said."
Funny, isn't it, how patients must now become medical experts themselves since they cannot rely on objective advice from their "medical professionals"?
Everything is corrupt and if not, why not?

Winfield J. Abbe said...

The following post was place to an article in the Athens Banner Herald
Dec.16, 2009 announcing a new "Healing Lodge" for Athens Regional Medical Center here:
The above anonymous comments are virtually meaningless and provide no enlightenment to a subject vital to every citizen. Both Athens Regional Medical Center and St. Mary's Hospital advertise in this newspaper and likely spend many thousands of dollars doing so. When they do, they do not present all sides of an issue, only one side since the object of the advertising is to bring you into the hospital. Don't rely on the editors of this newspaper to bring the other side to you either on the editorial page.
Do you think if a patient was killed or nearly killed from cancer treatment here you will be told about it? No, you won't be told.
The dismal facts are that while multi billions of public and private dollars have been squandered on the failed war on cancer for almost 40 years, the only approved "treatments", mistreatments would be a more appropriate description, are "successful" in only a small number of instances; most of the time the result is failure. But all those involved demand and usually receive big money for their often failed efforts and if they fail, you or your loved ones will likely not even receive an apology let alone a refund of your or your insurance company's money. Over half a million victims will die this year either from cancer, treatment or both, usually treatment. Most of the "approved" medical procedures were never tested at all and are little more than quack medicine. If any do work, it is likely by accident, not design. The cancer generals obviously do not know what they are doing.
However if you or a loved one is touched by cancer you have a better chance at a major cancer center like the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas or similar place, than you will at even Emory. Local hospitals simply do not have the expertise to deal with these diseases.
Let me give you an example. A hospital is a dangerous place to be today because while you may get "cured" of some problem, you may also contract some terrible disease from the environment of the hospital itself. All doctors know this. This is why all intelligent medical doctors do everything possible to limit hospital stays. This is not just for money, but to prevent further contact with horrible staff bacteria that are everywhere in any hospital.
A cancer patient is usually placed on chemotherapy. When this is given, it virtually destroys the immune system. Therefore there is little or no protection from exposure to bacteria in hospitals. In other words, the hospital is the worst place to administer the horrible and toxic chemicals to kill the cancer cells, but ofter also kill the wrong good cells too. But the hospital is where most patients are treated or were treated here in Athens at least about ten years ago. But then, a patient at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston would come in on say a Friday, where they attached a portable pump, which pumped the chemotherapy into the patient over the weekend slowly. The patient returned the next week to have the pump removed. This was an intelligent way to do this since the patient was not exposed to all those horrible bacteria in the hospital, and it was easier on the heart of the patient too. This procedure is still not being done here in Athens so far as I know. This is just one example of how you will not receive the same treatment locally as at a major cancer center where virtually all they do is treat cancer patients. Here are a few references to read on this subject. The first documents my experiences locally with the local hospital. Its CEO would not return telephone calls when my wife was nearly killed at ARMC, not from cancer but treatment. The local newspaper killed an article disclosing what happened too.
Continued below:

Winfield J. Abbe said...

Continued from above:
"An Unsuccessful Effort to Deny Use of State of Georgia Facilities for Fund Raising by the American Cancer Society" by Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., May, 2000, available at the local public library, Heritage Room.
"American Cancer Society America's Wealthiest 'Non-Profit' Institution" by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., International Journal of Health Services, 1999, also available at www.preventcancer.com. The local newspaper editors also refused to publish a letter to the editor from professor Epstein about ten years ago disputing most of what the CEO of the American CAncer Society one John Seffrin, Ed.D., said about cancer in a lecture at UGA.
"The Cancer Industry" by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D., Equinox Press, N.Y., 1996, first published as "The CAncer Syndrome" about 1980. Dr. Moss was fired from the position of Assistant Director of Public Affairs at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York in the 1970's for refusing to lie to the public about cancer research on Laetrile. He holds a Ph.D. degree in classics from Stanford University in California. He is a world authority on cancer today.
"The Truth About Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks" by Joseph Gold, M.D., 2005 at www.hydrazinesulfate.org. This is basically a criminal indictment of the National Cancer Institute and the Institutes of Health and the FDA. Dr. Gold is a distinguished medical doctor who earned his medical degree in New York and did post graduate work at UC Berkeley.
"University Fails to Offer Another Viewpoint" by Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., at www.annieappleseedproject.org. This website is operated by Ann Fonfa a cancer survivor from New York.
"The Hidden Story of Cancer" by Brian Peskin and Amid Habib, M.D., Pinnacle Press, Houston, 2006-2008.
"Criminal FDA Must be Charged with Cancer Quackery" by Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., TOPIX, Bethesda, MD.

Joshua said...

Can't believe people actually buy into this garbage. While yes tumors need glucose for their survival, they obtain it readily from the blood. Glucose is not only metabolized from carbohydrates, but from also lipids and proteins through different metabolic pathways such as gluconeogenesis which can be driven by the tumors own ability to secrete endocrine hormones such as GH, CRH, and ACTH. These have an effect opposite of insulin and promote hyperglycemia so how would you believe that insulin promotes cancer growth? Tissue's can become cancerous after a genetic mutation occurs causing hyperplasia, metaplasia, dysplasia, then it comes malignant. There are so many biochemical pathways occuring at once, you can not actually believe that GLUT transporters and insulin drug antagonists actually are the smoking gun. Oncology research takes place everywhere by so many different factions. I know that numerous undergrad biology professors were actively involved in research as well as a huge number of my MD and PharmD clinicians. I can definitely say that, if a cure for cancer was found, it would not be the government to hide since most of this research is done privately at universities and medical schools and due to the huge amounts of money that can potentially be made by discovering new mechanisms on how exactly cells undergo such processes as dysplasia to cancer thus using new drugs to combat its replication.

Steve said...

There a no nasty evil men in dark basements plotting people's demise. However the economic structure of our health care system creates a situation with much worse results.

Anything that does well in the lab has to fit into an economic model before it comes to market.

read Bruce Nussbaums excellent book "Good Intentions"

Winfield J. Abbe said...

In a press release dated June 6, 2010 from Scott C. Tips, J.D., President of the National Health Federation, the following quotation was included in the statement:

"Last week, the United States District Court in the District of Columbia ruled that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had violated the First Amendment free-speech rights of a dietary-supplement company when it arbitrarily censored truthful and non-misleading claims about selenium’s benefits in reducing the risk of cancer. The FDA has never wanted the real truth about the benefits of supplements and true nutrition to come out. This is not the first time, nor will it be the last time, that the FDA must have its face pressed to the table and its arm twisted behind its back before it cries “uncle!”– albeit with fingers crossed.
This latest victory in court against the FDA is the seventh in a long line of cases against the FDA, generally known as the Pearson (for NHF supporter Durk Pearson) cases. These lawsuits quite properly sought to restore to companies and individuals the right to make truthful and non-misleading statements about the products they are selling. In fact, the National Health Federation was one of the plaintiffs in the first such case; and, as such, we helped to win that very important first lawsuit that set the tone and winning streak for all of the subsequent cases up to the present win. Had we been invited to join in the recent legal action, then we would have done so; but no such invitation was given as many persons now – having seen the fame that has accrued to being the lead (i.e., the first-named) plaintiff in a successful case – scramble quickly to achieve the same fame by being the plaintiff in such a case. Frankly, after having hit the FDA hard over the head six plus times, the Courts have made it a bit of a no-brainer to win this seventh time in court on the same basic issue."
The above propaganda article regarding a cancer drug for skin cancer was first reported in the NYTimes and many other newspapers like this one, but the news about how the criminal FDA has lost another lawsuit in its efforts to repress nutritional supplements that prevent the horrible disease of cancer before it gets out of control, do not receive a word of attention. Shame shame shame on the editors of this and other newspapers for their failure to publish this sordid information about the criminal FDA. By the way, do not most of the employees of the FDA possess "higher education" too? What happened? Why do they continue to lie and flaunt the law and misuse the power of government against the basic rights of free citizens?
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
The above comment was placed at a report of the propanda article on advances in skin cancer in the Athens Banner Herald June 6, 2010. Plenty of media attention for trivial drug improvements, but no attention to how the criminal FDA seeks to obstruct prevention of cancer through nutritional supplements like selenium for which there is a mountain of evidence indicating its preventive effects based on science, but obstructed by the criminal enterprise FDA

Bobby Blackwell said...

WOW! the comment here is as informative as the post itself. Thank you to all of those who contributed. The comments are single post itself.

Anonymous said...



hello to you all, my name is Wendy Brims , i am from Vegas here in united state, i wish to tell you all, how i find a doctor that cure me from SKIN BREAST CANCER, which i had for three years with his natural herbal medicine i bought from him, it all went this way, i was online one very day when i saw a comment of a woman called MARIA KATRINA from united kingdom sharing her testimony about how this very doctor cured her of HIV, and he also cured AIDS too, but i never really believed but i just decided to give it a try and i contacted DOCTOR EHOHO, so he told me anything i needed to know and what to do to get cured and free from my BREAST cancer issue, so i went straight and make provisions for the herbs which he used to prepare medicine for me,i applied the medicine and just to see that the exact day which doctor EHOHO said i we be cured i was felling good and healthy at once, my strength was regained i went for check up in the hospital and my family doctor told me i am free from BREAST cancer, this was the greatest miracle that has happened to me in my life, and i promise doctor EHOHO that i we share his good work to the world, i gave his email to my friends,they were having similar disease problem and now they are cured from the diseases such as: Sexual Health and Sexually Transmitted Infection/Disease / HPV/HERPES KIDNEY/ HEART DISEASE and many more i can say he make used of natural herbs for them. these are few i can say about this DOCTOR EHOHO, i went with my family to thank him for his great work and solution in my life, wish i never expected this was possible, I we like you to contact him today on his private EMAIL ADDRESS. drehohospiritualtemple@gmail.com or call +2381040033845. if you have any health issue i believe this doctor can help you out as well.Reply him now for your cure.